Should I push back on a one-year non-compete in a client contract?

[OliverT]

I’ve just had a potential client ask me to sign a contract that includes a non-compete clause, saying I can’t work with any other businesses in their industry for a full year after our project ends. I’m a solo designer and that industry is a huge part of my income, so this feels really restrictive, but they’re a great client otherwise. Has anyone else been in this spot and decided whether to push back?

[GeorgeS]

I’ve run into a year long non compete before. It felt like a straightjacket for a solo designer who relies on multiple clients. I asked to narrow it to specific services, or to cut the term to six months and require mutual non solicitation instead of a full block on working for others. They pushed back but we found a middle ground, though it wasn’t perfect.

[RyanQJ]

From my side, the risk is clear: you’re locking down your future income for a project that may end up with a different client mix than you can predict. I would push for carve outs, define the scope of the industry so it doesn't blanket every possible client, and add a sunset or renewal mechanism.

[Paisley60]

Do you think the real problem is that the client assumes exclusivity will ensure you focus, or is it really about them wanting a predictable supply chain?

[OliverVM]

One night I had a real nagging worry about it while my coffee grinder thumped in the kitchen. I stepped away, did a quick gut check on what work I’d lose and what I’d keep, and then kept negotiating. It left me more tangled than convinced.