Login

I’m trying to decide if we should move a significant portion of our paid search budget into programmatic display, but I’m struggling to gauge the real impact on lead quality. Our last test seemed to drive a higher volume of form fills, but the sales team said those leads were much colder and harder to qualify compared to our search campaigns.

Had something similar last quarter. We moved about a third of paid search budget into programmatic display for a test. Volumes rose; form fills were up around 20 percent, but the sales team swore the leads felt colder and took longer to qualify. We tried a simple fix: added a prequalification field and a two-step nurture, plus we looked at time-to-first-contact. We saw faster initial responses but the SQL rate didn’t improve much. Still, it felt like the traffic quality shifted, not just the number.

I did a two week test and walked away with more questions than answers. We saw a bump in form fills, but the pipeline ended up with more low-intent contacts. Attribution looked messy; we couldn't pin revenue back to programmatic confidently. It made me wonder if the real issue is our offer or our landing page, not the channel.

I put in a quick, concrete action: a 24 hour speed-to-lead rule and a dedicated SDR handoff for any programmatic form. We tracked lead-to-demo rate and cost per SQL for both channels. The speed rule reduced no-shows and found that the best leads were still the ones who clicked a specific mid funnel ad. The data looked better on SQL rate, but the total pipeline was still similar. Hard to tell if the channel is helping or just shuffling leads.

Do you think the cold leads come from targeting, or is there a bigger funnel issue?

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me