How do you handle the cap rate gap when underwriting a small multifamily deal?
#1
I’m looking at a small multi-family property where the seller’s pro forma shows a strong cap rate, but when I adjust for what I believe are the actual market rents and include a more realistic maintenance reserve, the numbers look a lot less attractive. How do you all handle this gap when you’re underwriting a deal?
Reply
#2
Yep, that gap is real. I start by validating the rent roll against market rents with local comps and broker surveys. If there’s a delta, I model a market rent adjustment and a higher vacancy allowance, then I bake in a real maintenance reserve or capex reserve (often 4–5% of gross income or a separate capex fund). Re-running NOI usually drops the cap rate from the seller’s figure to something closer to what I’d expect. In a recent deal the adjustment knocked the yield down by a couple points, which changed my bid strategy.
Reply
#3
I’ve sometimes found the culprit isn’t rents at all but expenses in the seller package. I pull market benchmarks for taxes, insurance, and maintenance and reprice those line items to market. Then I run two or three scenarios: flat rents, 2–3% rent growth, and a conservative 0% growth with a solid reserve. The cash flow looks totally different under those, and it makes me rethink debt service assumptions.
Reply
#4
Sometimes the problem feels like timing or financing more than rents. I’ve had deals where once I added debt service at a market rate and checked the DSCR under the adjusted NOI, the numbers got tight or negative. It’s a reminder to look at financing terms as part of the gap, not just the operating side.
Reply
#5
Have you tried a simple sensitivity table on rent delta, vacancy, and maintenance?
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: