Login

We’ve hit a point where our current operational model is starting to crack under the pressure of new client volume. I’m specifically worried about our ability to maintain service quality without a clear framework for delegation and oversight. How have others structured this transition from a hands-on founder team to a more distributed leadership model?

In our case we moved from a founder led punch list to a small group of senior owners. We picked one owner per domain (ops, product, client success) and gave them a monthly SLA and a clear escalation path. The founder stayed as the escalation filter for really sticky stuff, not the daily decision maker. At first the service quality stayed rough and we saw a 15% bump in late deliveries. After we published a dashboard so each owner could see their metrics and started tying decisions to those numbers, things quieted down a bit. It still felt fragile and we learned the hard way that you can't fake authority with an org chart.

We did an offsite, wrote up a plan, then drifted back into the old cadence. The new roles existed on paper, but the frontline teams kept turning to founders for triage. I remember one sprint where we sprinted on a Friday, only to realize Monday morning the handoffs had broken again.

Maybe the problem isn’t structure but incentives. We kept rewarding speed over thoroughness, so quality slid even with more hands on deck.

This is messy for us too. I half believed a new hire would fix it, so we brought in a COO and then pulled back on decision rights instead of clarifying them. We ended up with two leaders stepping on each other’s toes and metrics that didn’t line up. Not sure what to trust anymore.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me