Login

I need to create software tutorials and documentation for my team. I've tried various screen recording tools but they're either too basic or overly complex with features I don't need. What screen recording tools have you used for creating clear, professional-looking tutorials? I need something that can handle both screen capture and webcam recording with good editing capabilities.

For creating software tutorials, I use Camtasia. It's more expensive than some options, but the editing capabilities are worth it for professional results. The ability to add callouts, zoom effects, and quizzes makes tutorials much more engaging. The learning curve isn't too bad, and there are plenty of templates to get started quickly.

I use OBS Studio for recording and DaVinci Resolve for editing. OBS is free and incredibly powerful for screen recording, especially if you need to record specific windows or applications. DaVinci Resolve is also free and professional-grade for editing. The combination requires more learning but gives you broadcast-quality results.

For quick tutorials, I use Loom. It's browser-based, requires no installation, and produces shareable links instantly. The editing features are basic but sufficient for most internal documentation. What I love is the simplicity - I can record, edit, and share a tutorial in minutes without opening complex software.

I’ve been culturing what I thought was a standard lab strain of *E. coli* for a protein expression experiment, but my last few plates show wildly inconsistent colony morphology and my control cultures aren’t reaching the expected optical density. I’m worried my stock might have developed a genetic mutation affecting its basic metabolism or that there’s some cryptic plasmid instability at play.

That kind of variability happens more than you’d think. Contamination, plasmid background drift, or subtle changes in what the stock has experienced can show up as odd colony shapes and readings. Usually it’s not one switch to flip but a provenance plus QC puzzle.

I’ve run into this when a stock had been stored for a while and then used in a different setup. Sometimes the story isn’t a mutation so much as history—the strain’s lineage, how it was thawed, what you fed it that day.

It’s easy to imagine a mutation, but a lot of times cryptic plasmid instability or metabolic burden on certain constructs shows up first as changes in growth and colony morphology. Hard to pin down without digging into the history.

We once chased a similar issue after a long run with a background strain and a marker; the behavior changed and it wasn’t dialogue with the genome so much as background context. It felt unsatisfying at the time.

Do you have provenance that the stock you’re using actually matches the expected genotype and background?

If you can, loop in a biosafety officer or the core facility for non-therapeutic QC like identity checks and contamination screening. They’re used to handling this kind of ambiguity.

Maybe the problem isn’t the genome at all but something in the workflow or in the way the controls are behaving. It’s frustrating to chase it down, and it may be worth stepping back and listing all the non-genetic factors you touched recently.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me