Login

I’m trying to figure out how to properly value my SaaS startup for a potential angel investment, but I’m getting wildly different numbers depending on whether I focus on our current MRR or projected growth. The investor is asking for a clear **pre-money valuation** justification, and I’m worried about anchoring too high and scaring them off or too low and leaving money on the table.

I tried to fix on a pre-money valuation once and I felt the ground shift under me. We built two tiny models: one based on trailing MRR with a modest growth path, another on full forecasted growth with a stronger ramp. The numbers diverged a lot, so we ended up presenting a range and the drivers instead of a single figure. In practice comps yielded roughly 4x to 6x ARR in a decent SaaS market; if you push expansion and low churn the range creeps toward 8x. We showed a one page, no fluff memo that laid out the range, the key assumptions, and the main risks. It felt safer than clinging to a single target.

From the investor side, I want to see what actually changes the value: retention, expansion, gross margin, and CAC payback. We asked to see trailing 12, 18 months, and a 24 month forecast, plus a simple unit economics chart. If the numbers are all in the air, the room gets tense fast.

I once fixated on MRR growth and got pushback from an investor who wanted profitability timing and a credible path to ARR. We pivoted to talk about net retention and expansion, added a plan to hit profitability in 18 months with disciplined hiring and tightened scope. It changed the conversation but not the outcome.

One quick question: do you know what hurdle the investor actually has in mind for the bet—ARR multiple, net retention, or something else?

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me