What time series method fixes autocorr in predictive maintenance residuals?
#1
With the increasing complexity of mobile devices, common mobile device errors are becoming more frequent. I've been documenting these issues as part of my tablet reviews and comparisons work, and there are some patterns emerging.

After one week of use with several 2025 tablets, I've encountered Wi-Fi connectivity issues that seem related to the new Wi-Fi 7 standard not playing nicely with older routers. Also, some devices have display calibration problems out of the box that require manual adjustment.

What common mobile device errors have you experienced? I'm compiling a list of the most frequent issues along with their solutions to help users avoid frustration and unnecessary repairs.
Reply
#2
I’ve been working on a predictive maintenance model using sensor data, and I’m hitting a wall with the temporal autocorrelation in the residuals. Every time I think I’ve got the model structure right, the diagnostic plots show that same pattern, and it’s throwing off the forecast intervals. I’m just not sure what the next step should be—do I need a different kind of time series approach entirely, or is there a way to adjust the current model that I’m missing?
Reply
#3
That residual pattern is rough. Start by giving the model a bit of autoregressive structure in the errors—an AR term or two—and see if the forecast intervals calm down. If it still looks odd, a state space or Kalman style setup might be the next playground.
Reply
#4
I tried adding an AR(1) to the forecast errors and re-fitting. Interval widths tightened a bit for a while, but the same pattern crept back after a few days.
Reply
#5
Maybe the issue isn’t the model at all but drift in the sensors or a missing external factor. Do you see any sensor drift, gaps, or regime changes that your current features aren’t capturing?
Reply
#6
I shuffled in a rolling window of features—recent sensor stats, a short history of temps, stuff like that—and tried a local model for bursts. It helped briefly but meant constant retuning.
Reply
#7
If you’re open to it, a Kalman filter or Bayesian dynamic regression can handle changing relationships over time without blowing up the interval estimates.
Reply
#8
I toyed with fancier time series like TBATS or Prophet, but often a simpler tweak—recentered baselines and a tiny drift term—made more difference than I expected.
Reply
#9
One time the bottleneck was data timing: different sampling frequencies over the dataset threw off the autocovariances. Once I aligned timestamps and resampled consistently, things cooled down a bit.
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: