Login

After 30 years of teaching chemistry, I've collected quite a few chemistry demonstration ideas that really capture students' attention. I'm putting together a collection of my favorite experimental chemistry techniques for classroom use.

What are your go-to chemistry demonstration ideas that never fail to impress? I'm looking for demonstrations that illustrate important chemistry concepts while being visually striking and safe for classroom settings.

I'm particularly interested in chemical reaction experiments that show color changes, gas production, or temperature changes. Bonus points for demonstrations that connect to real-world applications or current chemistry research updates.

One of my favorite chemistry demonstration ideas is the rainbow flask" or chemical traffic light. It uses glucose, sodium hydroxide, and indigo carmine. When you shake the flask, it cycles through yellow, red, and green colors due to redox reactions. Students are always amazed.

Another winner is the "elephant toothpaste" demonstration with concentrated hydrogen peroxide, potassium iodide, and dish soap. The rapid decomposition produces a huge column of foam. It teaches about catalysts and exothermic reactions dramatically.

For gas production, the reaction between baking soda and vinegar in a flask with a balloon over the top shows gas laws in action. The balloon inflates with CO2. Simple but effective for teaching about chemical reaction experiments and gas properties.

As a student, the demonstrations I remember best are the ones that surprised me. Our teacher did the blue bottle" experiment where a clear solution turns blue when shaken, then clears when left standing. The color change back and forth was magical.

Another one that stuck with me was burning money that doesn't burn. The teacher soaked paper money in a mixture of water and alcohol, then lit it. The alcohol burns but the water keeps the paper from burning. It taught about combustion temperatures and heat capacity in a memorable way.

I think the best chemistry demonstration ideas are those that create cognitive dissonance - they show something that seems to contradict everyday experience, then explain the chemistry behind it. Those lessons really stick.

For connecting with current chemistry research updates, I like demonstrations that show materials science applications. Shape memory alloys that return to their original shape when heated, or polymers that change color with temperature (thermochromic).

Ferrofluids are always popular - magnetic liquids that form spikes in a magnetic field. They demonstrate magnetic properties and surface tension in a visually striking way. You can connect this to applications in medicine (drug delivery) and engineering.

Another idea: demonstrate superhydrophobic surfaces using commercially available spray or by creating your own with nanoparticles. Show how water beads up and rolls off. This connects to current research in self-cleaning surfaces and waterproofing technologies. These experimental chemistry techniques bridge classroom learning with real-world applications.

I just finished the latest episode and I’m genuinely confused about what the protagonist’s true goal is anymore. The show keeps hinting at a deeper past, but the recent focus on political maneuvering makes their original quest for revenge feel almost forgotten. It’s making me question if I’ve misunderstood their character from the start.

I'm with you I kept thinking revenge was the core but the last episodes keep shifting to past hints and to political plots and now the goal feels foggy.

I actually paused and rewound a couple of scenes trying to map what they were chasing compared to the backstory we were shown a while ago some hints point to a debt or a promise not just a vendetta.

Maybe the real issue is not the motive but the world around them and the show seems to demand you care about who is in power rather than why they fight, is that really the problem or is the motive still there somewhere?

I would lean toward the idea that revenge still flickers under the surface but it is tangled with guilt and protection of someone else and that makes the path messier I am not sure that means the character changed so much as the stakes did.

Another thought I had is what if the past is the real trigger but the writer wants to show it through politics to make it feel contemporary I am not convinced.

I did a quick check of fans online and saw people arguing about whether a key scene was a clue or red herring I still don't feel confident about where this is going.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me